European IP filing, July 2026
Filings in July 2026 are provisional: registers publish weeks after the filing date, so the figure grows for some months. The revised figures for June 2026 are close to complete, and every table below beyond the first is computed for that month. Generated 2026-10-03.
Europe
Europe
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 80,579 | 75,051 | 61,068 | +9.1% |
| Designs | 8,746 | 9,455 | 11,617 | +3.1% |
| Patentspublished | 19,769 | 18,371 | 9,642 | +1.5% |
Totals cover every register. Each change is measured like for like, over the registers whose coverage is the same in both years: Trademarks over 30 (61,474 against 56,342); Designs over 5 (8,953 against 8,682); Patents over 4 (2,284 against 2,251).
In June 2026, largest applicant origin France at 22.6%; 33,190 of 59,809 applicants (55.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 20,253 | 12.4% | +28.1% |
| Class 41 | 16,987 | 10.4% | +23.9% |
| Class 9 | 13,028 | 8.0% | +20.5% |
| Class 42 | 12,547 | 7.7% | +45.7% |
| Class 25 | 7,975 | 4.9% | +8.4% |
| Class 16 | 5,633 | 3.4% | +9.2% |
| Class 43 | 5,430 | 3.3% | +18.5% |
| Class 44 | 4,894 | 3.0% | +15.3% |
| Class 36 | 4,541 | 2.8% | +13.7% |
| Class 3 | 4,147 | 2.5% | -1.3% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS, S.L.P. (ALSO TRADING AS LIDERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS)ES | 711 | 1.1% | +17.5% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileES | 646 | 1.0% | +36.9% |
| 3 | IOANNIDES, CLEANTHOUS & CO LLCCY | 491 | 0.7% | -13.6% |
| 4 | MetidaLV | 456 | 0.7% | -12.5% |
| 5 | MetidaEE | 456 | 0.7% | -12.5% |
| 6 | IPP Master LimitedGB | 445 | 0.7% | -32.8% |
| 7 | Marks & Clerk LLPGB | 421 | 0.6% | +80.0% |
| 8 | Goddar, Heinz J.DE | 409 | 0.6% | – |
| 9 | Firm without a published profileFR | 404 | 0.6% | – |
| 10 | KBZ Żuradzki Barczyk & Wspólnicy Adwokaci i Radcy Prawni Sp. k.PL | 377 | 0.6% | +9.6% |
Oppositions filed in June 2026
| Office | Source | June 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| EUIPO | EUIPO statistics, edition August 2026 | 2,032 |
| EUIPO | IPRATE, in full detail | 1,798 |
| Benelux (BOIP) | IPRATE feed | 132 |
| United Kingdom | IPRATE feed | 504 |
EUIPO's row is the office's own count. IPRATE's row is the oppositions we hold in full detail: who opposed, which classes, which representative. Benelux and the United Kingdom come from those offices' own feeds.
EU-level offices
EUIPO
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 11,908 | 11,923 | 10,927 | +9.1% |
| Designs | 6,760 | 7,365 | 7,007 | +5.1% |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
EU trade mark applications in June 2026: the office total and who filed
| Applications | June 2026 | Share | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applications receivedEUIPO statistics, edition August 2026 | 17,866 | – | 15,802 | +13.1% |
| Direct applicationsIPRATE's copy of the register | 14,890 | – | 13,488 | +10.4% |
| with a professional representative | 11,851 | 79.6% | 11,162 | +6.2% |
| without a representative | 3,039 | 20.4% | 2,326 | +30.7% |
| Madrid designations of the EUderived: office total minus direct applications | 2,976 | 16.7% | 2,314 | +28.6% |
Shares of the two representative lines are of direct applications; the Madrid share is of the office total. IPRATE rates representatives, so the EUIPO row of the filings table counts the direct applications that named one when IPRATE acquired them (11,923). The register copy names a representative on 11,851 of them today; the difference is representatives appointed or withdrawn after filing. An application without a representative was filed by the applicant itself. The office total is EUIPO's own figure, as published in its statistics edition August 2026. Designations of the EU through the Madrid system carry no filing date in the register copy, so the Madrid line is the office total minus the direct applications, a derived figure. Source: EUIPO, Statistics for European Union Trade Marks, monthly evolution.
In June 2026, largest applicant origin CN at 27.9%; 4,544 of 8,879 applicants (51.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 9 | 568 | 4.7% | -8.2% |
| Class 3 | 359 | 3.0% | +1.7% |
| Class 9,42 | 335 | 2.8% | +55.1% |
| Class 25 | 294 | 2.4% | -4.2% |
| Class 5 | 278 | 2.3% | -1.8% |
| Class 21 | 255 | 2.1% | +1.2% |
| Class 28 | 231 | 1.9% | +6.0% |
| Class 7 | 174 | 1.4% | +3.0% |
| Class 12 | 172 | 1.4% | +11.0% |
| Class 20 | 169 | 1.4% | -18.4% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS, S.L.P. (ALSO TRADING AS LIDERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS)ES | 711 | 2.8% | +17.5% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileES | 646 | 2.6% | +36.9% |
| 3 | IOANNIDES, CLEANTHOUS & CO LLCCY | 489 | 1.9% | -13.3% |
| 4 | MetidaLV | 456 | 1.8% | -12.5% |
| 5 | MetidaEE | 456 | 1.8% | -12.5% |
| 6 | KBZ Żuradzki Barczyk & Wspólnicy Adwokaci i Radcy Prawni Sp. k.PL | 377 | 1.5% | +9.6% |
| 7 | Francesco AgostiniIT | 308 | 1.2% | -9.7% |
| 8 | Sach & AssociatesDE | 250 | 1.0% | +117.4% |
| 9 | Isabelle BertauxFR | 221 | 0.9% | -45.3% |
| 10 | ZHOU, QIANGFR | 210 | 0.8% | -11.4% |
EPO
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 17,289 | 15,387 | 383 | coverage changed |
In June 2026, largest applicant origin US at 22.6%; 0 of 5,799 applicants (0.0%) were filing for the first time.
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goddar, Heinz J.DE | 409 | 2.6% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileFR | 344 | 2.1% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileDE | 300 | 1.9% | – |
| 4 | Marks & Clerk LLPGB | 268 | 1.7% | – |
| 5 | Vossius & Partner Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte mbBDE | 248 | 1.5% | – |
| 6 | Grünecker Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartG mbBDE | 246 | 1.5% | – |
| 7 | GULDE & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSKANZLEI MBBDE | 200 | 1.2% | – |
| 8 | HGFGB | 183 | 1.1% | – |
| 9 | Mewburn Ellis LLPGB | 173 | 1.1% | – |
| 10 | Haseltine Lake Kempner LLPGB | 166 | 1.0% | – |
By country
Austria · Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland · France · Germany · Greece · Hungary · Iceland · Ireland · Italy · Latvia · Liechtenstein · Lithuania · Luxembourg · Malta · Netherlands · Norway · Poland · Portugal · Romania · Slovakia · Slovenia · Spain · Sweden · Switzerland · United Kingdom
Austria
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 536 | 479 | 406 | +18.0% |
| Designs | 3 | 37 | 63 | coverage changed |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 90.1% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 258 of 431 applicants (59.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 181 | 13.0% | +38.2% |
| Class 41 | 170 | 12.2% | +12.6% |
| Class 42 | 102 | 7.3% | -1.0% |
| Class 9 | 102 | 7.3% | +56.9% |
| Class 25 | 69 | 5.0% | +109.1% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SCHÖNHERR RECHTSANWÄLTE GMBHAT | 11 | 6.0% | – |
| 2 | Puchberger & Partner PatentanwälteAT | 10 | 5.5% | – |
| 3 | SONN Patentanwälte GmbH & Co KGAT | 7 | 3.8% | – |
| 4 | PENDL MAIR RECHTSANWÄLTE OGAT | 6 | 3.3% | – |
| 5 | Wildhack & Jellinek Patentanwälte GmbHAT | 5 | 2.7% | – |
Belgium
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 807 | 692 | 482 | +43.6% |
| Designs | 19 | 27 | 23 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 131 | 103 | 19 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 92.3% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 463 of 730 applicants (63.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 236 | 13.3% | +67.4% |
| Class 41 | 197 | 11.1% | +56.3% |
| Class 42 | 158 | 8.9% | +79.5% |
| Class 9 | 149 | 8.4% | +56.8% |
| Class 25 | 76 | 4.3% | +18.8% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GEVERSBE | 50 | 14.5% | +13.6% |
| 2 | AWA BENELUX SABE | 24 | 6.9% | – |
| 3 | Brantsandpatents bvBE | 18 | 5.2% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileBE | 13 | 3.8% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileBE | 13 | 3.8% | – |
Bulgaria
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 418 | 457 | 351 | +30.2% |
| Designs | 5 | 7 | 8 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 1 | 14 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 92.3% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 183 of 312 applicants (58.7%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 244 | 14.4% | +49.7% |
| Class 41 | 174 | 10.3% | +29.9% |
| Class 9 | 99 | 5.9% | +13.8% |
| Class 42 | 98 | 5.8% | +108.5% |
| Class 25 | 76 | 4.5% | +105.4% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Велислав Николаев ДрамовBG | 29 | 7.6% | – |
| 2 | Костадин Чанев МаневBG | 19 | 5.0% | – |
| 3 | Румен Дончев ДаракевBG | 17 | 4.5% | – |
| 4 | Атанас Богомилов КостовBG | 15 | 3.9% | – |
| 5 | Ай Пи Консултинг ООДBG | 14 | 3.7% | – |
Croatia
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 82 | 105 | 100 | +5.0% |
| Designs | 8 | 28 | 4 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 108 | 93 | 19 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 55.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 45 of 178 applicants (25.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 43 | 16.0% | +22.9% |
| Class 41 | 34 | 12.7% | – |
| Class 43 | 20 | 7.5% | – |
| Class 9 | 19 | 7.1% | – |
| Class 5 | 15 | 5.6% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZMP IP d.o.o.HR | 38 | 12.8% | – |
| 2 | Vukmir i suradnici odvjetničko društvo d.o.o.HR | 15 | 5.1% | – |
| 3 | Hraste & Partneri odvjetničko društvo d.o.o.HR | 12 | 4.1% | – |
| 4 | PRODUCTA d.o.o.HR | 9 | 3.0% | – |
| 5 | CPZ - CENTAR ZA PATENTE d.o.o.HR | 7 | 2.4% | – |
Cyprus
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 114 | 69 | 89 | -22.5% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 256 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 80.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 41 of 57 applicants (71.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 23 | 16.8% | – |
| Class 42 | 18 | 13.1% | – |
| Class 36 | 16 | 11.7% | – |
| Class 9 | 13 | 9.5% | – |
| Class 41 | 11 | 8.0% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Γεώργιος Λ. Σαββίδης & Σία Δ.Ε.Π.Ε.CY | 10 | 22.7% | – |
| 2 | ANDREAS COUCOUNIS & CO LLCCY | 6 | 13.6% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileCY | 4 | 9.1% | – |
| 4 | ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΣ ΛΥΜΠΕΡΗΣCY | 3 | 6.8% | – |
| 5 | ANDREAS I. KARYDES & CO LLCCY | 2 | 4.5% | – |
Czech Republic
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 790 | 872 | 600 | +45.3% |
| Designs | 4 | 7 | 2 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 8 | 115 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 94.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 356 of 594 applicants (59.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 509 | 15.1% | +61.1% |
| Class 41 | 375 | 11.1% | +65.2% |
| Class 42 | 242 | 7.2% | +93.6% |
| Class 9 | 225 | 6.7% | +87.5% |
| Class 16 | 164 | 4.9% | +53.3% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mgr. Petr Bílý, LL.M.CZ | 20 | 2.9% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileCZ | 20 | 2.9% | – |
| 3 | Rott, Růžička & Guttmann a spol.CZ | 18 | 2.6% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileCZ | 15 | 2.2% | – |
| 5 | JUDr. Jan BártaCZ | 14 | 2.0% | – |
Denmark
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 161 | 171 | 173 | -1.2% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 9 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 5 | 11 | 70 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 72.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 75 of 146 applicants (51.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 58 | 14.0% | +23.4% |
| Class 9 | 32 | 7.7% | – |
| Class 42 | 31 | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| Class 35 | 29 | 7.0% | -31.0% |
| Class 16 | 25 | 6.1% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zacco Denmark A/SDK | 12 | 9.1% | – |
| 2 | ADVOKATBYRÅN GULLIKSSON ABSE | 12 | 9.1% | – |
| 3 | Bruun & Hjejle AdvokatpartnerselskabDK | 10 | 7.6% | – |
| 4 | AWA Denmark A/SDK | 8 | 6.1% | – |
| 5 | Kromann Reumert AdvokatpartnerselskabDK | 7 | 5.3% | – |
Estonia
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 119 | 115 | 95 | +21.1% |
| Designs | 1 | 2 | 1 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 1 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 97.6% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 62 of 97 applicants (63.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 30 | 10.4% | – |
| Class 42 | 29 | 10.0% | – |
| Class 41 | 25 | 8.7% | – |
| Class 9 | 19 | 6.6% | – |
| Class 32 | 17 | 5.9% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAA Patendibüroo OÜEE | 15 | 32.6% | – |
| 2 | Metida Patendibüroo OÜEE | 9 | 19.6% | – |
| 3 | Patendibüroo KÄOSAAR OÜEE | 7 | 15.2% | – |
| 4 | Patendibüroo Ustervall OÜEE | 6 | 13.0% | – |
| 5 | KOPPEL PATENDIBÜROO OÜEE | 2 | 4.3% | – |
Finland
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 183 | 208 | 305 | -31.8% |
| Designs | 8 | 9 | 5 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 53 | 84 | 76 | +10.5% |
In June 2026, 93.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 108 of 243 applicants (44.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 68 | 15.1% | -32.0% |
| Class 35 | 49 | 10.9% | -19.7% |
| Class 9 | 34 | 7.6% | -2.9% |
| Class 16 | 25 | 5.6% | – |
| Class 25 | 23 | 5.1% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berggren OyFI | 30 | 20.5% | – |
| 2 | Papula OyFI | 16 | 11.0% | – |
| 3 | Kolster Oy AbFI | 14 | 9.6% | – |
| 4 | Laine IP OyFI | 12 | 8.2% | – |
| 5 | Boco IP Oy AbFI | 7 | 4.8% | – |
France
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 18,130 | 13,267 | 4,380 | coverage changed |
| Designs | 547 | 629 | 532 | +18.2% |
| Patentspublished | 933 | 1,766 | 1,779 | -0.7% |
In June 2026, 96.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 7,170 of 11,121 applicants (64.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 4,989 | 13.7% | – |
| Class 41 | 4,448 | 12.2% | – |
| Class 42 | 3,601 | 9.9% | – |
| Class 9 | 2,692 | 7.4% | – |
| Class 25 | 1,831 | 5.0% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LavoixFR | 235 | 4.0% | – |
| 2 | IpsilonFR | 84 | 1.4% | – |
| 3 | GEVERS & ORESFR | 62 | 1.1% | – |
| 4 | CasalongaFR | 57 | 1.0% | – |
| 5 | RegimbeauFR | 55 | 0.9% | – |
Germany
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 8,094 | 8,311 | 7,235 | +14.9% |
| Designs | 159 | 52 | 2,444 | coverage changed |
| Patentspublished | 44 | 23 | 4,666 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 91.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 379 of 732 applicants (51.8%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 3,032 | 12.8% | +24.0% |
| Class 41 | 2,477 | 10.5% | +23.2% |
| Class 9 | 2,140 | 9.0% | +23.3% |
| Class 42 | 1,806 | 7.6% | +51.3% |
| Class 25 | 1,341 | 5.7% | +16.8% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rechtsanw. Süle, LL.M., ÁkosDE | 133 | 5.1% | +16.7% |
| 2 | Rechtsanw. Barczyk, MarcinPL | 85 | 3.3% | – |
| 3 | Slopek RechtsanwälteDE | 76 | 2.9% | +123.5% |
| 4 | BREUER LEHMANN RECHTSANWÄLTE PARTNERSCHAFT MBBDE | 66 | 2.5% | +8.2% |
| 5 | Patentanw. Margue, Robert Germain, M.Sc., PhDDE | 58 | 2.2% | – |
Greece
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 716 | 633 | 588 | +7.7% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 113 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 43 | 37 | 41 | -9.8% |
In June 2026, 94.3% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 348 of 542 applicants (64.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 184 | 11.4% | +34.3% |
| Class 41 | 145 | 9.0% | +33.0% |
| Class 43 | 114 | 7.1% | +22.6% |
| Class 42 | 102 | 6.3% | +64.5% |
| Class 9 | 94 | 5.8% | +100.0% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileGR | 7 | 3.3% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileGR | 6 | 2.8% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileGR | 6 | 2.8% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileGR | 6 | 2.8% | – |
| 5 | ΠΑΝΑΓΙΩΤΑ ΠΑΠΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΙΟΥGR | 5 | 2.4% | – |
Hungary
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 375 | 396 | 305 | +29.8% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 8 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 38 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 92.4% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 168 of 301 applicants (55.8%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 139 | 16.4% | +47.9% |
| Class 35 | 98 | 11.6% | +27.3% |
| Class 42 | 68 | 8.0% | +100.0% |
| Class 43 | 53 | 6.2% | +32.5% |
| Class 9 | 49 | 5.8% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bodó Ügyvédi IrodaHU | 17 | 6.8% | – |
| 2 | DANUBIA Szabadalmi és Jogi Iroda Kft.HU | 12 | 4.8% | – |
| 3 | DR. CZIRJÁK - NAGY ÜGYVÉDI IRODAHU | 8 | 3.2% | – |
| 4 | dr. Kocsomba NelliHU | 6 | 2.4% | – |
| 5 | dr. Berényi KrisztinaHU | 6 | 2.4% | – |
Iceland
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 329 | 341 | 328 | +4.0% |
| Designs | 1 | 3 | 2 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 1 | 1 | 3 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 20.3% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 59 of 254 applicants (23.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 9 | 76 | 9.7% | -5.0% |
| Class 5 | 75 | 9.5% | +41.5% |
| Class 42 | 59 | 7.5% | +5.4% |
| Class 35 | 54 | 6.9% | -28.9% |
| Class 41 | 42 | 5.3% | 0.0% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARNASON FAKTORIS | 19 | 44.2% | -40.6% |
| 2 | Sigurjónsson & Thor ehfIS | 7 | 16.3% | – |
| 3 | G.H. Sigurgeirsson ehf.IS | 6 | 14.0% | – |
| 4 | Fenix Legal KBIS | 3 | 7.0% | – |
| 5 | Isabelle Bertaux - IBE avocatIS | 1 | 2.3% | – |
Ireland
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 296 | 306 | 305 | coverage changed |
| Designs | 0 | 10 | 4 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 1 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 82.4% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 133 of 237 applicants (56.1%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 83 | 13.1% | – |
| Class 35 | 73 | 11.5% | – |
| Class 9 | 52 | 8.2% | – |
| Class 42 | 51 | 8.0% | – |
| Class 44 | 40 | 6.3% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRKellyIE | 47 | 15.0% | – |
| 2 | TOMKINS & CO.IE | 13 | 4.2% | – |
| 3 | MACLACHLAN IP LIMITED trading as MACLACHLAN IPIE | 11 | 3.5% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileIE | 5 | 1.6% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileIE | 4 | 1.3% | – |
Italy
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 4,650 | 3,974 | 5,452 | -27.1% |
| Designs | 1 | 14 | 99 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 3 | 4 | 888 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 100.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 1,756 of 3,257 applicants (53.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 1,114 | 12.7% | +14.6% |
| Class 41 | 979 | 11.1% | +6.1% |
| Class 42 | 590 | 6.7% | +47.1% |
| Class 9 | 525 | 6.0% | +11.7% |
| Class 25 | 514 | 5.8% | +0.2% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lorenzo SciarraIT | 46 | 6.6% | +31.4% |
| 2 | Cerino SalvatoreIT | 30 | 4.3% | – |
| 3 | d'angelo raffaeleIT | 30 | 4.3% | 0.0% |
| 4 | LA MALFA ENRICO TINDAROIT | 19 | 2.7% | -53.7% |
| 5 | MAGGIO MATTEO MARIAIT | 18 | 2.6% | – |
Latvia
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 41 | 86 | 95 | -9.5% |
| Designs | 6 | 1 | 5 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 2 | 0 | 71 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 89.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 25 of 53 applicants (47.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 33 | 18.9% | – |
| Class 41 | 29 | 16.6% | – |
| Class 30 | 10 | 5.7% | – |
| Class 29 | 8 | 4.6% | – |
| Class 25 | 7 | 4.0% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileLV | 4 | 11.8% | – |
| 2 | CLARUS MANAGEMENT, SIALV | 3 | 8.8% | – |
| 3 | Olga VahatovaLV | 3 | 8.8% | – |
| 4 | AAA Law LatviaLV | 3 | 8.8% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileLV | 2 | 5.9% | – |
Liechtenstein
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 30 | 4 | 41 | too few to compare |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 3 | 10 | 150 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 14.3% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 0 of 12 applicants (0.0%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 12 | 1 | 20.0% | – |
| Class 34 | 1 | 20.0% | – |
| Class 37 | 1 | 20.0% | – |
| Class 41 | 1 | 20.0% | – |
| Class 9 | 1 | 20.0% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Erhard KrumpholzCH | 2 | 12.5% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileLI | 2 | 12.5% | – |
| 3 | Isler & Pedrazzini AGCH | 2 | 12.5% | – |
| 4 | P&TS SACH | 1 | 6.2% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileCH | 1 | 6.2% | – |
Lithuania
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 421 | 417 | 221 | +88.7% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 1 | 3 | 8 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 93.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 129 of 194 applicants (66.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 146 | 17.1% | +124.6% |
| Class 41 | 117 | 13.7% | +138.8% |
| Class 44 | 52 | 6.1% | +73.3% |
| Class 37 | 48 | 5.6% | +60.0% |
| Class 42 | 39 | 4.6% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileLT | 123 | 25.9% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileLT | 123 | 25.9% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileLT | 16 | 3.4% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileLT | 16 | 3.4% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileLT | 16 | 3.4% | – |
Luxembourg
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 93 | 69 | 71 | -2.8% |
| Designs | 0 | 2 | 4 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 514 | 403 | 110 | coverage changed |
In June 2026, 17.5% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 23 of 384 applicants (6.0%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 21 | 13.5% | – |
| Class 9 | 18 | 11.6% | – |
| Class 30 | 14 | 9.0% | – |
| Class 42 | 12 | 7.7% | – |
| Class 41 | 11 | 7.1% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patent42 SALU | 183 | 38.1% | +408.3% |
| 2 | IP ShieldLU | 100 | 20.8% | +132.6% |
| 3 | Valet Patent Services LimitedDE | 30 | 6.2% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileDE | 30 | 6.2% | – |
| 5 | Biopatents IP ConsultancyNL | 13 | 2.7% | – |
Malta
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 236 | 175 | 143 | +22.4% |
| Designs | 5 | 0 | 3 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 84.6% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 46 of 86 applicants (53.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 20 | 11.4% | – |
| Class 43 | 19 | 10.9% | – |
| Class 41 | 16 | 9.1% | – |
| Class 37 | 14 | 8.0% | – |
| Class 44 | 12 | 6.9% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileMT | 40 | 34.2% | – |
| 2 | Dr. Luigi A. SansoneMT | 15 | 12.8% | – |
| 3 | Jeanine RizzoMT | 5 | 4.3% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileMT | 4 | 3.4% | – |
| 5 | Dr Michael GrechMT | 3 | 2.6% | – |
Netherlands
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,772 | 1,417 | 1,228 | +15.4% |
| Designs | 48 | 191 | 53 | coverage changed |
| Patentspublished | 356 | 397 | 355 | +11.8% |
In June 2026, 86.5% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 819 of 1,594 applicants (51.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 477 | 13.5% | +25.5% |
| Class 42 | 348 | 9.9% | +46.8% |
| Class 41 | 334 | 9.5% | +25.6% |
| Class 9 | 309 | 8.8% | +10.8% |
| Class 25 | 151 | 4.3% | -1.9% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ir. W.J.J.M. KempesNL | 66 | 6.6% | +20.0% |
| 2 | MERK-ECHT B.V.NL | 62 | 6.2% | +51.2% |
| 3 | NOVAGRAAF NEDERLAND BV IINL | 61 | 6.1% | +96.8% |
| 4 | MERKENBUREAU KNIJFF & PARTNERS B.V.NL | 43 | 4.3% | +38.7% |
| 5 | ir. F.A. Geurts c.s.NL | 38 | 3.8% | – |
Norway
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,285 | 1,219 | 1,476 | -17.4% |
| Designs | 40 | 56 | 134 | -58.2% |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 27.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 642 of 959 applicants (66.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 9 | 386 | 12.7% | -5.6% |
| Class 42 | 319 | 10.5% | +3.2% |
| Class 35 | 255 | 8.4% | -16.7% |
| Class 41 | 184 | 6.1% | +5.1% |
| Class 5 | 134 | 4.4% | -8.2% |
Poland
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,656 | 2,727 | 1,314 | +107.5% |
| Designs | 3 | 17 | 36 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 10 | 10 | 432 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 94.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 968 of 1,436 applicants (67.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 1,077 | 15.7% | +152.2% |
| Class 41 | 726 | 10.6% | +105.1% |
| Class 42 | 428 | 6.2% | +185.3% |
| Class 9 | 414 | 6.0% | +84.8% |
| Class 44 | 339 | 4.9% | +78.4% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profilePL | 211 | 9.8% | – |
| 2 | Ewelina JasionPL | 211 | 9.8% | – |
| 3 | Karolina Bogusz METIDA SP. Z O.O.PL | 28 | 1.3% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profilePL | 27 | 1.3% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profilePL | 27 | 1.3% | – |
Portugal
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,983 | 1,962 | 1,581 | +24.1% |
| Designs | 18 | 43 | 13 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 3 | 11 | 31 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 97.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 1,225 of 1,854 applicants (66.1%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 475 | 13.6% | +24.0% |
| Class 35 | 464 | 13.3% | +28.9% |
| Class 42 | 271 | 7.8% | +33.5% |
| Class 43 | 233 | 6.7% | +30.2% |
| Class 44 | 191 | 5.5% | +29.1% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profilePT | 36 | 9.0% | – |
| 2 | JOÃO MANUEL MAY PEREIRA DA CRUZPT | 21 | 5.3% | – |
| 3 | MÁRIO JOÃO DE SÁ E MELO DE CASTRO MARQUESPT | 16 | 4.0% | – |
| 4 | LOURENÇO DE MELO PORTUGAL SALUCE DE SAMPAIOPT | 14 | 3.5% | – |
| 5 | Abel Dário Pinto de OliveiraPT | 11 | 2.8% | – |
Romania
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,018 | 955 | 951 | +0.4% |
| Designs | 89 | 21 | 7 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 96.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 554 of 823 applicants (67.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 467 | 18.2% | +10.7% |
| Class 41 | 273 | 10.6% | +13.3% |
| Class 43 | 154 | 6.0% | +65.6% |
| Class 9 | 142 | 5.5% | +8.4% |
| Class 42 | 133 | 5.2% | +41.5% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WEIZMANN ARIANA & PARTNERS AGENTIE DE PROPRIETATE INTELECTUALARO | 77 | 17.0% | +63.8% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileRO | 20 | 4.4% | – |
| 3 | RODALL SRL AGENTIE DE PROPRIETATE INDUSTRIALARO | 20 | 4.4% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileRO | 17 | 3.7% | – |
| 5 | APPELLO BRANDS SRLRO | 14 | 3.1% | – |
Slovakia
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 248 | 323 | 354 | -8.8% |
| Designs | 7 | 8 | 5 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 16 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 81.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 131 of 213 applicants (61.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 189 | 16.6% | +1.6% |
| Class 41 | 150 | 13.2% | -7.4% |
| Class 42 | 78 | 6.9% | +100.0% |
| Class 16 | 68 | 6.0% | -39.3% |
| Class 9 | 66 | 5.8% | -31.2% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileSK | 12 | 5.3% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileSK | 11 | 4.8% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileSK | 11 | 4.8% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileSK | 10 | 4.4% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileSK | 9 | 4.0% | – |
Slovenia
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 85 | 106 | 80 | +32.5% |
| Designs | 2 | 0 | 1 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 3 | 0 | 13 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 84.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 40 of 71 applicants (56.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 57 | 17.1% | – |
| Class 41 | 45 | 13.5% | – |
| Class 9 | 27 | 8.1% | – |
| Class 42 | 25 | 7.5% | – |
| Class 36 | 16 | 4.8% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRANDA intelektualna lastnina d.o.o.SI | 6 | 18.2% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileSI | 4 | 12.1% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileSI | 4 | 12.1% | – |
| 4 | Lemur Legal d.o.o.SI | 3 | 9.1% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileSI | 3 | 9.1% | – |
Spain
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 7,004 | 6,749 | 5,951 | +13.4% |
| Designs | 960 | 869 | 971 | -10.5% |
| Patentspublished | 6 | 7 | 71 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 99.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 4,500 of 6,621 applicants (68.0%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 1,705 | 16.4% | +11.3% |
| Class 35 | 1,586 | 15.3% | +18.4% |
| Class 42 | 823 | 7.9% | +48.8% |
| Class 9 | 618 | 5.9% | +20.2% |
| Class 43 | 604 | 5.8% | -10.8% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Juan Carlos Del Valle ValienteES | 60 | 11.4% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileES | 50 | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileES | 50 | 9.5% | – |
| 4 | Isabel Carvajal y UrquijoES | 48 | 9.1% | – |
| 5 | Eduardo Fernando Prados HerradaES | 37 | 7.0% | -41.3% |
Sweden
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 475 | 586 | 502 | +16.7% |
| Designs | 17 | 23 | 23 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 1 | 1 | 124 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 92.5% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 339 of 553 applicants (61.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 161 | 13.9% | +41.2% |
| Class 41 | 136 | 11.8% | +30.8% |
| Class 42 | 121 | 10.5% | +47.6% |
| Class 9 | 116 | 10.0% | +141.7% |
| Class 25 | 46 | 4.0% | -13.2% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AWA Sweden ABSE | 14 | 8.4% | – |
| 2 | Zacco Sweden ABSE | 14 | 8.4% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileSE | 8 | 4.8% | – |
| 4 | VAMO VARUMÄRKESOMBUDET ABSE | 7 | 4.2% | – |
| 5 | Scaevola Services Ltd.BG | 6 | 3.6% | – |
Switzerland
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,982 | 1,829 | 1,618 | +13.0% |
| Designs | 35 | 34 | 38 | -10.5% |
| Patentspublished | 3 | 10 | 150 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 77.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 735 of 1,483 applicants (49.6%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 552 | 11.5% | +26.0% |
| Class 9 | 497 | 10.4% | +29.4% |
| Class 42 | 348 | 7.3% | +15.2% |
| Class 41 | 328 | 6.8% | +28.1% |
| Class 25 | 229 | 4.8% | +37.1% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E. Blum & Co. AGCH | 43 | 4.5% | -18.9% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileCH | 43 | 4.5% | – |
| 3 | Walder Wyss AGCH | 37 | 3.8% | – |
| 4 | Wild Schnyder AGCH | 31 | 3.2% | – |
| 5 | BUGNION SACH | 21 | 2.2% | – |
United Kingdom
| Right type | July 2026 (provisional) | June 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 14,542 | 14,108 | 13,321 | +5.9% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In June 2026, 70.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 7,335 of 11,865 applicants (61.8%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 3,703 | 12.2% | +26.2% |
| Class 9 | 3,312 | 11.0% | +17.6% |
| Class 41 | 2,906 | 9.6% | +26.4% |
| Class 42 | 2,499 | 8.3% | +42.8% |
| Class 25 | 1,812 | 6.0% | +4.3% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IPP Master LimitedGB | 445 | 6.6% | -32.8% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileGB | 351 | 5.2% | -9.1% |
| 3 | STONEBRIDGE (CN) VAT ADVISERS LIMITEDGB | 123 | 1.8% | – |
| 4 | HGFGB | 101 | 1.5% | -9.8% |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileGB | 84 | 1.3% | -25.7% |
How to read these figures
- Trade marks and designs are counted by filing date. Registers publish weeks after filing, so the current month is provisional and the previous month is the revised figure; every detail table is computed for the revised month.
- Patents are counted by publication date: a patent application is published eighteen months after filing, so its filing month says nothing for a year and a half.
- EU trade marks, EU designs and European patents are counted once each, not once per designated country. Europe is the sum of the national registers and the two offices.
- A year-on-year change is printed only where both months are complete and the register's coverage is the same in both years. Where coverage changed, or the revised month is still being published, the change is withheld rather than printed as a market move. Europe's change is measured like for like, over the registers that pass that test this month; its totals are shown in full.
- Firm names appear only where an IPRATE profile is published; other firms keep their rank and count.
- A first-time filer is an applicant name with no earlier filing in the IPRATE corpus, which begins in 2004 for most registers.
- Oppositions: EUIPO's row is the office's own count; IPRATE's row is the oppositions held in full detail. Benelux and United Kingdom counts come from those offices' feeds. Comparisons with a year earlier start with the January 2027 issue.
- EUIPO's row in the filings tables counts direct EU trade mark applications that name a professional representative, the market IPRATE rates. The EUIPO section reconciles that count to the office's own monthly total: direct applications with and without a representative from IPRATE's copy of the register, and Madrid designations of the EU as the difference to the total EUIPO publishes.
The full report for July 2026, with every scope, the complete firm tables and the names of the month's first-time filers, is available on request through the contact page.