European IP filing, August 2026
Filings in August 2026 are provisional: registers publish weeks after the filing date, so the figure grows for some months. The revised figures for July 2026 are close to complete, and every table below beyond the first is computed for that month. Generated 2026-10-08.
Europe
Europe
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 63,566 | 80,572 | 67,748 | -0.6% |
| Designs | 6,570 | 9,076 | 13,307 | -16.3% |
| Patentspublished | 15,525 | 19,826 | 7,064 | +11.2% |
Totals cover every register. Each change is measured like for like, over the registers whose coverage is the same in both years: Trademarks over 29 (61,950 against 62,297); Designs over 5 (8,342 against 9,968); Patents over 4 (1,385 against 1,245).
In July 2026, largest applicant origin France at 25.1%; 35,390 of 64,135 applicants (55.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 22,077 | 12.5% | +14.1% |
| Class 41 | 18,539 | 10.5% | +15.0% |
| Class 9 | 14,829 | 8.4% | +19.6% |
| Class 42 | 14,426 | 8.1% | +45.6% |
| Class 25 | 8,420 | 4.8% | -6.4% |
| Class 16 | 6,130 | 3.5% | -3.5% |
| Class 43 | 5,482 | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Class 44 | 5,243 | 3.0% | +3.3% |
| Class 36 | 4,785 | 2.7% | +0.6% |
| Class 37 | 4,649 | 2.6% | +13.4% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileES | 643 | 1.0% | +22.9% |
| 2 | INTERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS, S.L.P. (ALSO TRADING AS LIDERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS)ES | 621 | 0.9% | +0.8% |
| 3 | Hoffmann Eitle PartmbBDE | 437 | 0.7% | -7.9% |
| 4 | Goddar, Heinz J.DE | 427 | 0.7% | – |
| 5 | IPP Master LimitedGB | 418 | 0.6% | -31.0% |
| 6 | Plasseraud IPFR | 389 | 0.6% | -31.2% |
| 7 | IOANNIDES, CLEANTHOUS & CO LLCCY | 379 | 0.6% | -40.8% |
| 8 | Marks & Clerk LLPGB | 355 | 0.5% | -50.3% |
| 9 | Vossius & Partner Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte mbBDE | 325 | 0.5% | – |
| 10 | HGFGB | 311 | 0.5% | -28.8% |
Oppositions filed in July 2026
| Office | Source | July 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| EUIPO | EUIPO statistics, edition September 2026 | 2,012 |
| EUIPO | IPRATE, in full detail | 1,920 |
| Benelux (BOIP) | IPRATE feed | 124 |
| United Kingdom | IPRATE feed | 558 |
EUIPO's row is the office's own count. IPRATE's row is the oppositions we hold in full detail: who opposed, which classes, which representative. Benelux and the United Kingdom come from those offices' own feeds.
EU-level offices
EUIPO
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 9,368 | 11,913 | 12,205 | -2.4% |
| Designs | 5,524 | 6,760 | 8,117 | -16.7% |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
EU trade mark applications in July 2026: the office total and who filed
| Applications | July 2026 | Share | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applications receivedEUIPO statistics, edition September 2026 | 17,420 | – | 18,164 | -4.1% |
| Direct applicationsIPRATE's copy of the register | 14,425 | – | 15,048 | -4.1% |
| with a professional representative | 11,654 | 80.8% | 12,433 | -6.3% |
| without a representative | 2,771 | 19.2% | 2,615 | +6.0% |
| Madrid designations of the EUderived: office total minus direct applications | 2,995 | 17.2% | 3,116 | -3.9% |
Shares of the two representative lines are of direct applications; the Madrid share is of the office total. IPRATE rates representatives, so the EUIPO row of the filings table counts the direct applications that named one when IPRATE acquired them (11,913). The register copy names a representative on 11,654 of them today; the difference is representatives appointed or withdrawn after filing. An application without a representative was filed by the applicant itself. The office total is EUIPO's own figure, as published in its statistics edition September 2026. Designations of the EU through the Madrid system carry no filing date in the register copy, so the Madrid line is the office total minus the direct applications, a derived figure. Source: EUIPO, Statistics for European Union Trade Marks, monthly evolution.
In July 2026, largest applicant origin CN at 26.4%; 4,723 of 10,285 applicants (45.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 9 | 529 | 4.4% | -20.0% |
| Class 3 | 389 | 3.3% | +9.6% |
| Class 5 | 307 | 2.6% | -13.8% |
| Class 9,42 | 296 | 2.5% | +19.4% |
| Class 25 | 275 | 2.3% | -20.5% |
| Class 28 | 231 | 1.9% | -10.1% |
| Class 21 | 211 | 1.8% | -21.9% |
| Class 6 | 210 | 1.8% | +233.3% |
| Class 11 | 196 | 1.6% | -7.1% |
| Class 33 | 190 | 1.6% | +10.5% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileES | 643 | 2.8% | +22.9% |
| 2 | INTERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS, S.L.P. (ALSO TRADING AS LIDERMARK PATENTES Y MARCAS)ES | 621 | 2.7% | +0.8% |
| 3 | IOANNIDES, CLEANTHOUS & CO LLCCY | 377 | 1.6% | -40.8% |
| 4 | Francesco AgostiniIT | 306 | 1.3% | -20.3% |
| 5 | MetidaEE | 296 | 1.3% | -48.3% |
| 6 | MetidaLV | 295 | 1.3% | -48.4% |
| 7 | KBZ Żuradzki Barczyk & Wspólnicy Adwokaci i Radcy Prawni Sp. k.PL | 275 | 1.2% | -31.1% |
| 8 | Sach & AssociatesDE | 241 | 1.1% | +167.8% |
| 9 | ZHOU, QIANGFR | 229 | 1.0% | -5.0% |
| 10 | Thomas Marinus Simon VennekerES | 228 | 1.0% | – |
EPO
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 13,765 | 17,291 | 321 | coverage changed |
In July 2026, largest applicant origin US at 25.5%; 0 of 6,698 applicants (0.0%) were filing for the first time.
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goddar, Heinz J.DE | 427 | 2.4% | – |
| 2 | Hoffmann Eitle PartmbBDE | 402 | 2.2% | – |
| 3 | Vossius & Partner Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte mbBDE | 311 | 1.7% | – |
| 4 | Plasseraud IPFR | 297 | 1.7% | – |
| 5 | Grünecker Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartG mbBDE | 261 | 1.5% | – |
| 6 | Marks & Clerk LLPGB | 257 | 1.4% | – |
| 7 | Murgitroyd & CompanyGB | 224 | 1.3% | – |
| 8 | HGFGB | 222 | 1.2% | – |
| 9 | Potter ClarksonGB | 219 | 1.2% | – |
| 10 | DEHNSGB | 217 | 1.2% | – |
By country
Austria · Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland · France · Germany · Greece · Hungary · Iceland · Ireland · Italy · Latvia · Liechtenstein · Lithuania · Luxembourg · Malta · Netherlands · Norway · Poland · Portugal · Romania · Slovakia · Slovenia · Spain · Sweden · Switzerland · United Kingdom
Austria
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 418 | 536 | 413 | +29.8% |
| Designs | 20 | 3 | 21 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 92.6% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 270 of 452 applicants (59.7%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 227 | 14.4% | +52.3% |
| Class 41 | 206 | 13.1% | +77.6% |
| Class 42 | 139 | 8.8% | +61.6% |
| Class 9 | 129 | 8.2% | +84.3% |
| Class 16 | 76 | 4.8% | +76.7% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HERBST KINSKY RECHTSANWÄLTE GMBHAT | 17 | 7.4% | – |
| 2 | ANWÄLTE MANDL & MITTERBAUER GMBHAT | 9 | 3.9% | – |
| 3 | SONN Patentanwälte GmbH & Co KGAT | 8 | 3.5% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileAT | 7 | 3.0% | – |
| 5 | E|N|W|C NATLACEN WALDERDORFF CANCOLA RECHTSANWÄLTE GMBHAT | 6 | 2.6% | – |
Belgium
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,264 | 807 | 480 | +68.1% |
| Designs | 8 | 19 | 15 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 76 | 131 | 13 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 94.1% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 412 of 669 applicants (61.6%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 266 | 13.4% | +66.2% |
| Class 41 | 220 | 11.1% | +86.4% |
| Class 42 | 175 | 8.8% | +66.7% |
| Class 9 | 148 | 7.5% | +120.9% |
| Class 44 | 94 | 4.7% | +95.8% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GEVERSBE | 62 | 15.8% | +3.3% |
| 2 | De Clercq & PartnersBE | 29 | 7.4% | – |
| 3 | Brantsandpatents bvBE | 28 | 7.1% | – |
| 4 | ORYON NVBE | 25 | 6.4% | – |
| 5 | Winger Trademarks BVBE | 23 | 5.9% | – |
Bulgaria
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 334 | 418 | 340 | +22.9% |
| Designs | 4 | 5 | 5 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 2 | 0 | 15 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 96.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 169 of 278 applicants (60.8%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 192 | 12.7% | +1.6% |
| Class 41 | 169 | 11.2% | +32.0% |
| Class 9 | 104 | 6.9% | +46.5% |
| Class 42 | 92 | 6.1% | +61.4% |
| Class 28 | 76 | 5.0% | +105.4% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manev, Kostadin ChanevBG | 42 | 13.0% | +40.0% |
| 2 | Светла Костадинова МаневаBG | 14 | 4.3% | – |
| 3 | Румен Дончев ДаракевBG | 11 | 3.4% | – |
| 4 | Ай Пи Консултинг ООДBG | 11 | 3.4% | – |
| 5 | IP CONSULTING LTD.BG | 11 | 3.4% | – |
Croatia
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 70 | 82 | 115 | -28.7% |
| Designs | 19 | 9 | 7 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 78 | 108 | 31 | coverage changed |
In July 2026, 44.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 32 of 170 applicants (18.8%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 33 | 12.6% | +10.0% |
| Class 41 | 33 | 12.6% | – |
| Class 43 | 18 | 6.9% | – |
| Class 5 | 15 | 5.7% | – |
| Class 39 | 14 | 5.4% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZMP IP d.o.o.HR | 37 | 20.2% | – |
| 2 | Vukmir i suradnici odvjetničko društvo d.o.o.HR | 18 | 9.8% | – |
| 3 | PRODUCTA d.o.o.HR | 13 | 7.1% | – |
| 4 | DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATESHR | 12 | 6.6% | – |
| 5 | CPZ - CENTAR ZA PATENTE d.o.o.HR | 9 | 4.9% | – |
Cyprus
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 62 | 114 | 135 | -15.6% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 1 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 102 | 256 | 3 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 26.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 45 of 311 applicants (14.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 34 | 15.2% | – |
| Class 35 | 32 | 14.3% | – |
| Class 42 | 25 | 11.2% | – |
| Class 36 | 18 | 8.0% | – |
| Class 9 | 12 | 5.4% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgios L. Savvidis & SiaCY | 62 | 23.0% | – |
| 2 | Δικηγορικό Γραφείο Δρος Χρίστου Α. Θεοδούλου Δ.E.Π.E.CY | 36 | 13.3% | – |
| 3 | Δρ. Νικόλαος ΛυμπέρηςCY | 31 | 11.5% | – |
| 4 | Ελένη ΧρυσοστομίδουCY | 22 | 8.1% | – |
| 5 | Lellos P. Dimitriadis Dikigoriko Grafeio D.E.P.E.CY | 17 | 6.3% | – |
Czech Republic
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 819 | 790 | 652 | +21.2% |
| Designs | 0 | 4 | 4 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 17 | 0 | 109 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 95.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 323 of 556 applicants (58.1%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 490 | 16.3% | +43.7% |
| Class 41 | 353 | 11.7% | +39.5% |
| Class 9 | 222 | 7.4% | +72.1% |
| Class 42 | 199 | 6.6% | +54.3% |
| Class 16 | 196 | 6.5% | +73.5% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Advokátní kancelář Pokorný, Wagner & partneři, s.r.o.CZ | 19 | 3.6% | – |
| 2 | JUDr. Jan SalmonCZ | 16 | 3.0% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileCZ | 16 | 3.0% | – |
| 4 | Mgr. Petr Bílý, LL.M.CZ | 9 | 1.7% | -71.0% |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileCZ | 9 | 1.7% | – |
Denmark
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 157 | 161 | 199 | -19.1% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 12 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 5 | 5 | 23 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 86.1% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 63 of 108 applicants (58.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 42 | 11.0% | – |
| Class 42 | 32 | 8.4% | -13.5% |
| Class 5 | 32 | 8.4% | -36.0% |
| Class 9 | 30 | 7.8% | -6.2% |
| Class 10 | 29 | 7.6% | -14.7% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PLESNER AdvokatpartnerselskabDK | 10 | 12.5% | – |
| 2 | Kromann Reumert AdvokatpartnerselskabDK | 9 | 11.2% | – |
| 3 | Zacco Denmark A/SDK | 8 | 10.0% | – |
| 4 | LØJE IP AdvokatfirmaDK | 7 | 8.8% | – |
| 5 | Patrade A/SDK | 7 | 8.8% | – |
Estonia
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 107 | 119 | 97 | +22.7% |
| Designs | 3 | 1 | 1 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 77.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 59 of 98 applicants (60.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 33 | 13.1% | – |
| Class 41 | 23 | 9.1% | – |
| Class 42 | 21 | 8.3% | – |
| Class 36 | 20 | 7.9% | – |
| Class 9 | 18 | 7.1% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAA Patendibüroo OÜEE | 20 | 47.6% | – |
| 2 | Patendi- & Kaubamärgibüroo Koitel OÜEE | 5 | 11.9% | – |
| 3 | Metida Patendibüroo OÜEE | 3 | 7.1% | – |
| 4 | Patendibüroo Restmark OÜEE | 3 | 7.1% | – |
| 5 | Pärn & Partners Patendibüroo OÜEE | 3 | 7.1% | – |
Finland
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 214 | 183 | 206 | -11.2% |
| Designs | 3 | 8 | 2 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 61 | 53 | 42 | +26.2% |
In July 2026, 91.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 117 of 215 applicants (54.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 58 | 17.5% | +23.4% |
| Class 9 | 41 | 12.4% | +36.7% |
| Class 35 | 28 | 8.5% | -20.0% |
| Class 42 | 26 | 7.9% | -13.3% |
| Class 32 | 15 | 4.5% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berggren OyFI | 15 | 15.6% | – |
| 2 | Kolster Oy AbFI | 15 | 15.6% | – |
| 3 | Laine IP OyFI | 10 | 10.4% | – |
| 4 | Moosedog OyFI | 6 | 6.2% | – |
| 5 | Boco IP Oy AbFI | 4 | 4.2% | – |
France
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 9,014 | 18,130 | 5,013 | coverage changed |
| Designs | 353 | 547 | 520 | +5.2% |
| Patentspublished | 846 | 933 | 817 | +14.2% |
In July 2026, 95.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 8,955 of 12,801 applicants (70.0%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 7,007 | 13.7% | – |
| Class 41 | 6,112 | 11.9% | – |
| Class 42 | 5,008 | 9.8% | – |
| Class 9 | 4,043 | 7.9% | – |
| Class 25 | 2,628 | 5.1% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IpsilonFR | 120 | 2.1% | – |
| 2 | SantarelliFR | 118 | 2.1% | – |
| 3 | CABINET GERMAIN & MAUREAUFR | 106 | 1.9% | – |
| 4 | CABINET BEAU DE LOMENIEFR | 85 | 1.5% | – |
| 5 | LavoixFR | 76 | 1.3% | – |
Germany
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 7,471 | 8,094 | 8,855 | -8.6% |
| Designs | 4 | 486 | 2,897 | coverage changed |
| Patentspublished | 46 | 44 | 3,889 | coverage changed |
In July 2026, 94.2% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 508 of 866 applicants (58.7%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 3,089 | 13.2% | +3.7% |
| Class 41 | 2,383 | 10.2% | +1.1% |
| Class 9 | 2,147 | 9.1% | +9.9% |
| Class 42 | 1,949 | 8.3% | +46.8% |
| Class 25 | 1,145 | 4.9% | -21.0% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rechtsanw. Süle, LL.M., ÁkosDE | 84 | 3.2% | -29.4% |
| 2 | BREUER LEHMANN RECHTSANWÄLTE PARTNERSCHAFT MBBDE | 82 | 3.1% | -28.1% |
| 3 | Rechtsanw. Liesmann, OliverDE | 72 | 2.7% | – |
| 4 | ZELLER & SEYFERT Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten mbBDE | 52 | 2.0% | -55.2% |
| 5 | Rechtsanw. Barczyk, MarcinPL | 52 | 2.0% | – |
Greece
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 439 | 716 | 629 | +13.8% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 75 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 17 | 43 | 34 | +26.5% |
In July 2026, 95.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 406 of 625 applicants (65.0%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 262 | 14.6% | +59.8% |
| Class 41 | 152 | 8.5% | +23.6% |
| Class 42 | 110 | 6.1% | +12.2% |
| Class 43 | 106 | 5.9% | -10.9% |
| Class 9 | 102 | 5.7% | +52.2% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileGR | 23 | 9.3% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileGR | 10 | 4.0% | – |
| 3 | ΜΑΡΟΥΛΗΣ ΑΝΔΡΕΑΣGR | 8 | 3.2% | – |
| 4 | IOANNA mPANTEKAGR | 7 | 2.8% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileGR | 6 | 2.4% | – |
Hungary
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 318 | 375 | 391 | -4.1% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 6 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 1 | 0 | 23 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 93.6% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 175 of 299 applicants (58.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 119 | 14.1% | -7.0% |
| Class 35 | 107 | 12.7% | +2.9% |
| Class 42 | 57 | 6.8% | +23.9% |
| Class 9 | 55 | 6.5% | -3.5% |
| Class 43 | 36 | 4.3% | -21.7% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cservenyák RenátaHU | 7 | 3.1% | – |
| 2 | dr. Kocsomba NelliHU | 6 | 2.7% | – |
| 3 | dr. Mikófalvi GáborHU | 6 | 2.7% | – |
| 4 | SBGK Ügyvédi IrodaHU | 6 | 2.7% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileHU | 5 | 2.2% | – |
Iceland
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 312 | 329 | 316 | +4.1% |
| Designs | 3 | 2 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 1 | 4 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 26.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 67 of 248 applicants (27.0%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 5 | 82 | 8.9% | +2.5% |
| Class 9 | 79 | 8.5% | +58.0% |
| Class 35 | 70 | 7.6% | +52.2% |
| Class 42 | 61 | 6.6% | +45.2% |
| Class 41 | 46 | 5.0% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARNASON FAKTORIS | 27 | 47.4% | -37.2% |
| 2 | Sigurjónsson & Thor ehfIS | 9 | 15.8% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileIS | 4 | 7.0% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileIS | 3 | 5.3% | – |
| 5 | G.H. Sigurgeirsson ehf.IS | 2 | 3.5% | – |
Ireland
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 310 | 296 | 330 | -10.3% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 3 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 5 | 1 | 0 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 85.6% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 137 of 247 applicants (55.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 64 | 12.2% | -1.5% |
| Class 35 | 53 | 10.1% | -29.3% |
| Class 9 | 48 | 9.2% | -14.3% |
| Class 42 | 44 | 8.4% | +18.9% |
| Class 25 | 28 | 5.4% | -24.3% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRKellyIE | 26 | 8.9% | – |
| 2 | TOMKINS & CO.IE | 6 | 2.1% | – |
| 3 | Murgitroyd & CompanyIE | 6 | 2.1% | – |
| 4 | MACLACHLAN IP LIMITED trading as MACLACHLAN IPIE | 4 | 1.4% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileIE | 4 | 1.4% | – |
Italy
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 2,784 | 4,650 | 6,178 | -24.7% |
| Designs | 0 | 1 | 109 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 3 | 3 | 607 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 100.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 1,702 of 3,191 applicants (53.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 1,084 | 12.5% | -6.4% |
| Class 41 | 1,054 | 12.2% | -6.4% |
| Class 42 | 583 | 6.7% | +17.8% |
| Class 9 | 553 | 6.4% | +3.6% |
| Class 43 | 451 | 5.2% | -4.0% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lorenzo SciarraIT | 57 | 7.9% | – |
| 2 | LA MALFA ENRICO TINDAROIT | 26 | 3.6% | -27.8% |
| 3 | Cerino SalvatoreIT | 20 | 2.8% | – |
| 4 | Avv. d'angelo raffaeleIT | 20 | 2.8% | -33.3% |
| 5 | MAGGIO MATTEO MARIAIT | 12 | 1.7% | -72.1% |
Latvia
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 40 | 41 | 100 | still being published |
| Designs | 4 | 6 | 3 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 2 | 2 | 80 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 95.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 28 of 44 applicants (63.6%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 13 | 17.1% | – |
| Class 43 | 11 | 14.5% | – |
| Class 41 | 8 | 10.5% | – |
| Class 30 | 5 | 6.6% | – |
| Class 42 | 5 | 6.6% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLARUS MANAGEMENT, SIALV | 3 | 33.3% | – |
| 2 | AGENCY TRIA ROBITLV | 2 | 22.2% | – |
| 3 | METIDA, SIALV | 1 | 11.1% | – |
| 4 | OLMANE LAW FIRM, SIALV | 1 | 11.1% | – |
| 5 | Artis KROMANIS, SIALV | 1 | 11.1% | – |
Liechtenstein
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 0 | 30 | 42 | coverage changed |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 2 | 3 | 75 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 46.4% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 8 of 22 applicants (36.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 9 | 10 | 13.3% | – |
| Class 35 | 7 | 9.3% | – |
| Class 3 | 6 | 8.0% | – |
| Class 14 | 5 | 6.7% | – |
| Class 42 | 5 | 6.7% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileLI | 8 | 30.8% | – |
| 2 | IPrime Künsch Patentanwälte GmbHLI | 4 | 15.4% | – |
| 3 | BOGENSBERGER Patent- & MarkenbüroLI | 2 | 7.7% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileLI | 2 | 7.7% | – |
| 5 | Kaminski HarmannLI | 2 | 7.7% | – |
Lithuania
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 334 | 421 | 296 | coverage changed |
| Designs | 1 | 0 | 2 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 1 | 4 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 95.2% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 167 of 220 applicants (75.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 148 | 17.5% | – |
| Class 41 | 99 | 11.7% | – |
| Class 44 | 61 | 7.2% | – |
| Class 42 | 53 | 6.3% | – |
| Class 9 | 48 | 5.7% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileLT | 92 | 29.0% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileLT | 57 | 18.0% | – |
| 3 | Firm without a published profileLT | 12 | 3.8% | – |
| 4 | Vilija ViešūnaitėLT | 12 | 3.8% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileLT | 12 | 3.8% | – |
Luxembourg
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 152 | 93 | 99 | -6.1% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 2 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 290 | 514 | 77 | coverage changed |
In July 2026, 15.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 40 of 481 applicants (8.3%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 32 | 13.8% | -17.9% |
| Class 41 | 30 | 12.9% | – |
| Class 42 | 28 | 12.1% | – |
| Class 9 | 23 | 9.9% | – |
| Class 30 | 13 | 5.6% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patent42 SALU | 240 | 39.0% | – |
| 2 | IP ShieldLU | 152 | 24.7% | – |
| 3 | Valet Patent Services LimitedDE | 42 | 6.8% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileDE | 42 | 6.8% | – |
| 5 | Biopatents IP ConsultancyNL | 22 | 3.6% | – |
Malta
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 228 | 236 | 174 | +35.6% |
| Designs | 3 | 5 | 5 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 73.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 55 of 93 applicants (59.1%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 43 | 39 | 16.5% | – |
| Class 35 | 26 | 11.0% | – |
| Class 9 | 19 | 8.1% | – |
| Class 36 | 17 | 7.2% | – |
| Class 41 | 16 | 6.8% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Luigi A. SansoneMT | 25 | 14.8% | – |
| 2 | Mamo TCV AdvocatesMT | 20 | 11.8% | – |
| 3 | CAMILLERI PREZIOSIMT | 19 | 11.2% | – |
| 4 | Jeanine RizzoMT | 10 | 5.9% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileMT | 8 | 4.7% | – |
Netherlands
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 2,779 | 1,772 | 1,324 | +33.8% |
| Designs | 27 | 48 | 25 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 121 | 356 | 352 | +1.1% |
In July 2026, 90.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 804 of 1,492 applicants (53.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 611 | 14.2% | +33.4% |
| Class 42 | 451 | 10.5% | +84.1% |
| Class 9 | 428 | 10.0% | +57.9% |
| Class 41 | 423 | 9.9% | +31.0% |
| Class 25 | 204 | 4.8% | +39.7% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MERK-ECHT B.V.NL | 65 | 6.7% | -3.0% |
| 2 | NOVAGRAAF NEDERLAND BV IINL | 48 | 4.9% | +54.8% |
| 3 | NLO SHIELDMARK B.V.NL | 36 | 3.7% | – |
| 4 | dr. ir. G.J.C. Verdijck c.s.NL | 33 | 3.4% | -2.9% |
| 5 | ir. W.J.J.M. KempesNL | 32 | 3.3% | -22.0% |
Norway
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,135 | 1,285 | 1,630 | -21.2% |
| Designs | 45 | 40 | 118 | -66.1% |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 23.5% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 688 of 1,028 applicants (66.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 9 | 375 | 11.6% | -10.9% |
| Class 42 | 289 | 8.9% | -14.5% |
| Class 35 | 244 | 7.5% | -30.9% |
| Class 5 | 203 | 6.3% | +6.8% |
| Class 41 | 164 | 5.1% | -28.4% |
Poland
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,455 | 1,656 | 1,539 | +7.6% |
| Designs | 5 | 3 | 52 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 20 | 10 | 221 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 96.2% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 803 of 1,272 applicants (63.1%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 591 | 14.8% | +19.2% |
| Class 41 | 418 | 10.5% | +20.5% |
| Class 9 | 300 | 7.5% | +36.4% |
| Class 42 | 243 | 6.1% | +56.8% |
| Class 44 | 163 | 4.1% | +1.9% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profilePL | 104 | 11.3% | – |
| 2 | Ewelina JasionPL | 104 | 11.3% | – |
| 3 | Paweł Gutowski SIEMIŃSKI GUTOWSKI KANCELARIA ADWOKACKA SP.J.PL | 17 | 1.8% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profilePL | 13 | 1.4% | – |
| 5 | Jolanta JustyńskaPL | 13 | 1.4% | – |
Portugal
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 1,994 | 1,983 | 1,864 | +6.4% |
| Designs | 29 | 18 | 28 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 3 | 9 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 96.2% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 1,178 of 1,771 applicants (66.5%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 470 | 13.4% | +19.3% |
| Class 41 | 445 | 12.7% | +2.5% |
| Class 43 | 268 | 7.6% | +14.5% |
| Class 42 | 238 | 6.8% | +24.0% |
| Class 36 | 181 | 5.2% | +32.1% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LOURENÇO DE MELO PORTUGAL SALUCE DE SAMPAIOPT | 24 | 6.0% | – |
| 2 | JOSÉ LUÍS FAZENDA ARNAUT DUARTEPT | 23 | 5.8% | – |
| 3 | ÁLVARO ALBANO DUARTE CATANAPT | 13 | 3.3% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profilePT | 12 | 3.0% | – |
| 5 | ANTÓNIO LUÍS CÔRTE REAL CRUZPT | 12 | 3.0% | – |
Romania
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 910 | 1,018 | 1,123 | -9.3% |
| Designs | 11 | 89 | 13 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 59 | 55 | 64 | coverage changed |
In July 2026, 95.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 584 of 921 applicants (63.4%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 436 | 17.9% | -6.8% |
| Class 41 | 313 | 12.9% | +11.0% |
| Class 42 | 175 | 7.2% | +50.9% |
| Class 43 | 150 | 6.2% | -23.5% |
| Class 9 | 127 | 5.2% | -13.6% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileRO | 63 | 11.6% | – |
| 2 | WEIZMANN ARIANA & PARTNERS AGENTIE DE PROPRIETATE INTELECTUALARO | 50 | 9.2% | -12.3% |
| 3 | NOMENIUS SRLRO | 27 | 5.0% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileRO | 22 | 4.1% | – |
| 5 | RODALL SRL AGENTIE DE PROPRIETATE INDUSTRIALARO | 21 | 3.9% | – |
Slovakia
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 305 | 248 | 376 | -34.0% |
| Designs | 19 | 7 | 41 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 9 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 87.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 101 of 178 applicants (56.7%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 142 | 16.9% | -28.6% |
| Class 41 | 114 | 13.6% | -20.8% |
| Class 42 | 76 | 9.0% | +28.8% |
| Class 9 | 71 | 8.4% | +42.0% |
| Class 16 | 44 | 5.2% | -22.8% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MG LEGAL s.r.o.SK | 15 | 9.5% | -67.4% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileSK | 9 | 5.7% | – |
| 3 | Dentons Europe CS LLPSK | 8 | 5.1% | – |
| 4 | MAJLINGOVÁ & PARTNERS, S.R.O.SK | 8 | 5.1% | – |
| 5 | Zivko Mijatovic and Partners s. r. o.SK | 7 | 4.4% | – |
Slovenia
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 62 | 85 | 80 | +6.2% |
| Designs | 0 | 3 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 4 | 3 | 24 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 96.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 41 of 76 applicants (53.9%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 47 | 17.7% | +4.4% |
| Class 41 | 38 | 14.3% | +8.6% |
| Class 43 | 18 | 6.8% | – |
| Class 9 | 17 | 6.4% | – |
| Class 39 | 16 | 6.0% | – |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firm without a published profileSI | 4 | 16.7% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileSI | 4 | 16.7% | – |
| 3 | PATENTNA PISARNA D.O.O.SI | 4 | 16.7% | – |
| 4 | Lemur Legal d.o.o.SI | 2 | 8.3% | – |
| 5 | Firm without a published profileSI | 2 | 8.3% | – |
Spain
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 5,334 | 7,002 | 6,266 | +11.7% |
| Designs | 413 | 960 | 1,171 | -18.0% |
| Patentspublished | 1 | 6 | 61 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 99.8% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 4,497 of 6,750 applicants (66.6%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 41 | 1,912 | 17.2% | +36.6% |
| Class 35 | 1,573 | 14.2% | +23.0% |
| Class 42 | 942 | 8.5% | +101.7% |
| Class 9 | 746 | 6.7% | +83.3% |
| Class 25 | 640 | 5.8% | +19.9% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAUL SANTOS RODRIGUEZES | 97 | 19.6% | – |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileES | 50 | 10.1% | – |
| 3 | SUGRANES, S.L.P.ES | 22 | 4.5% | – |
| 4 | Firm without a published profileES | 22 | 4.5% | – |
| 5 | ROBERTO MOLERO MOLEROES | 20 | 4.0% | – |
Sweden
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 639 | 475 | 417 | +13.9% |
| Designs | 40 | 17 | 10 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 1 | 82 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 93.7% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 286 of 453 applicants (63.1%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 116 | 12.6% | +3.6% |
| Class 9 | 99 | 10.7% | +52.3% |
| Class 41 | 95 | 10.3% | +13.1% |
| Class 42 | 88 | 9.6% | +72.5% |
| Class 25 | 61 | 6.6% | +69.4% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scaevola Services Ltd.BG | 15 | 12.1% | – |
| 2 | AWA Sweden ABSE | 5 | 4.0% | – |
| 3 | ADVOKATFIRMAN VINGE KBSE | 5 | 4.0% | – |
| 4 | Freja Partner ABSE | 4 | 3.2% | – |
| 5 | Abion ABSE | 4 | 3.2% | – |
Switzerland
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 2,045 | 1,972 | 1,738 | +13.5% |
| Designs | 32 | 35 | 42 | -16.7% |
| Patentspublished | 2 | 3 | 75 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 78.9% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 895 of 1,579 applicants (56.7%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 614 | 11.5% | +43.1% |
| Class 9 | 593 | 11.1% | +58.1% |
| Class 42 | 410 | 7.7% | +43.4% |
| Class 41 | 342 | 6.4% | +17.9% |
| Class 16 | 224 | 4.2% | +34.9% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E. Blum & Co. AGCH | 31 | 3.2% | -48.3% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileCH | 31 | 3.2% | – |
| 3 | Walder Wyss AGCH | 27 | 2.8% | -18.2% |
| 4 | Winzenried LegalCH | 27 | 2.8% | – |
| 5 | Isler & Pedrazzini AGCH | 26 | 2.7% | -31.6% |
United Kingdom
| Right type | August 2026 (provisional) | July 2026 (revised) | A year earlier | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trademarks | 12,693 | 14,542 | 14,126 | +2.9% |
| Designs | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
| Patentspublished | 0 | 0 | 0 | too few to compare |
In July 2026, 74.0% of filings with a known applicant origin were domestic; 7,561 of 12,156 applicants (62.2%) were filing for the first time.
Top Nice classes, trademarks
| Nice class | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Class 35 | 3,832 | 12.4% | +23.8% |
| Class 9 | 3,532 | 11.5% | +17.9% |
| Class 41 | 2,947 | 9.6% | +22.5% |
| Class 42 | 2,759 | 9.0% | +53.1% |
| Class 25 | 1,744 | 5.7% | -4.1% |
Leading firms by filings
| # | Firm | Filings | Share | Change y/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IPP Master LimitedGB | 418 | 6.1% | -31.0% |
| 2 | Firm without a published profileGB | 309 | 4.5% | -32.2% |
| 3 | ILVCN LIMITEDGB | 113 | 1.6% | – |
| 4 | STONEBRIDGE (CN) VAT ADVISERS LIMITEDGB | 95 | 1.4% | – |
| 5 | HGFGB | 89 | 1.3% | -28.8% |
How to read these figures
- Trade marks and designs are counted by filing date. Registers publish weeks after filing, so the current month is provisional and the previous month is the revised figure; every detail table is computed for the revised month.
- Patents are counted by publication date: a patent application is published eighteen months after filing, so its filing month says nothing for a year and a half.
- EU trade marks, EU designs and European patents are counted once each, not once per designated country. Europe is the sum of the national registers and the two offices.
- A year-on-year change is printed only where both months are complete and the register's coverage is the same in both years. Where coverage changed, or the revised month is still being published, the change is withheld rather than printed as a market move. Europe's change is measured like for like, over the registers that pass that test this month; its totals are shown in full.
- Firm names appear only where an IPRATE profile is published; other firms keep their rank and count.
- A first-time filer is an applicant name with no earlier filing in the IPRATE corpus, which begins in 2004 for most registers.
- Oppositions: EUIPO's row is the office's own count; IPRATE's row is the oppositions held in full detail. Benelux and United Kingdom counts come from those offices' feeds. Comparisons with a year earlier start with the January 2027 issue.
- EUIPO's row in the filings tables counts direct EU trade mark applications that name a professional representative, the market IPRATE rates. The EUIPO section reconciles that count to the office's own monthly total: direct applications with and without a representative from IPRATE's copy of the register, and Madrid designations of the EU as the difference to the total EUIPO publishes.
The full report for August 2026, with every scope, the complete firm tables and the names of the month's first-time filers, is available on request through the contact page.