Who Are the Best Patent Firms in the Czech Republic? (2026)
IPRATE analysed 113 firms across 2,823 European (EPO) patent filings in Czech Republic; 50 firms met the evidence thresholds and are ranked below (Top Rated is the top quarter, every other firm is Rated). Based on official EUIPO, EPO and national IP office records. Ratings are never sold or sponsored.
Comparing patent firms in Czech Republic
This table compares European (EPO) filing records for the country shown. Start with the rating tier, then compare annual filing volume, outcomes and confidence on each firm profile. Compare like-for-like practices and periods: a high success rate on a small record is different evidence from the same rate across a large portfolio.
Compare the firm's technical subject areas and filing experience, then discuss drafting, prosecution and the jurisdictions you need. Use the published record to build a shortlist and confirm the fit with the firm. Filing outcomes describe the measured work; they do not establish litigation experience or predict the outcome of your case.
| # | Firm | City | Tier | Vol/yr | Success | Speed | Renewals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ing. Václav Kratochvíl | Praha | Top Rated | 7.857143 | 61% | 1635d | N/A |
| 2 | KANIA, SEDLÁK, SMOLA | Brno | Top Rated | 4.285714 | 70% | 1157d | N/A |
| 3 | Ing. Jiří Sedlák | České Budějovice | Top Rated | 8.52381 | 56% | 1332d | N/A |
| 4 | RNDr. Kateřina Hartvichová | Praha 5 | Top Rated | 16.133333 | 70% | 1464d | N/A |
| 5 | Tomickova, Dana | Brno | Top Rated | 6.5 | 100% | 1005d | N/A |
| 6 | Ing. Dušan Kendereški | Brno | Top Rated | 4.190476 | 70% | 1527d | N/A |
| 7 | Dobroslav Musil a partneři | Brno | Top Rated | 14.272727 | 63% | 1538d | N/A |
| 8 | Ing. Petr Soukup | Prague | Top Rated | 2.3 | 58% | 1400d | N/A |
| 9 | Ing. Jiří Andera | Prague | Top Rated | 2.8 | 72% | 1314d | N/A |
| 10 | Ing. Leopold Dadej | Břeclav | Top Rated | 4.888889 | 76% | 1193d | N/A |
| 11 | Zmeskal, Lukas | Plzeň | Top Rated | 4.2 | 92% | 984d | N/A |
| 12 | Ing. Hana Dušková | Praha | Top Rated | 2.125 | 88% | 1098d | N/A |
| 13 | Ing. Libor Markes | Brno | Top Rated | 1.705882 | 41% | 1263d | N/A |
| 14 | Jirotkova, Ivana | Praha | Rated | 7.095238 | 55% | 1555d | N/A |
| 15 | JUDr. Martina Dvořáková | Praha 8 | Rated | 2.333333 | 65% | 1649d | N/A |
| 16 | Ing. Tomas Pavlica | Praha 1 | Rated | 2.285714 | 58% | 1729d | N/A |
| 17 | Ing. Milan Škoda | Nové Město nad Metují | Rated | 3.47619 | 68% | 1595d | N/A |
| 18 | Harber IP | Prague | Rated | 20 | 61% | 1232d | N/A |
| 19 | Ing. Veronika Zemanová | Brno | Rated | 4.142857 | 83% | 1879d | N/A |
| 20 | ing. Karel Novotný | Praha | Rated | 2.111111 | 39% | 1966d | N/A |
| 21 | Ing. Pavel Reichel | Praha | Rated | 1.545455 | 63% | 1374d | N/A |
| 22 | Ing. Marta Gabrielová | Praha 5 | Rated | 4.375 | 71% | 1633d | N/A |
| 23 | RNDr. Roman Hák | Praha 7 | Rated | 1.727273 | 74% | 1758d | N/A |
| 24 | Ing. Dana Kreizlová | Zlín | Rated | 2.176471 | 53% | 2177d | N/A |
| 25 | Ing. Lunzarová, Lucie | Brno | Rated | 1.533333 | 83% | 1364d | N/A |
| 26 | Mgr. Bc. Irena Langrová | Plzen | Rated | 2.230769 | 25% | 1771d | N/A |
| 27 | Mgr. Kamil Kolátor | Liberec | Rated | 1.8 | 7% | 1345d | N/A |
| 28 | Ing. Dr. Vilém Daněk, LL.M., PhD. | Praha 2 | Rated | 2.210526 | 54% | 2233d | N/A |
| 29 | Ing. František Kania | Brno | Rated | 2.7 | 44% | 1293d | N/A |
| 30 | Plicka, Josef | Praha 5 | Rated | 1.652174 | 57% | 1702d | N/A |
| 31 | Ing. Benda, Tomas | Brno | Rated | 1.571429 | 64% | 1403d | N/A |
| 32 | Ing. Marie Smrčková | Prague | Rated | 1.15 | 80% | 1721d | N/A |
| 33 | Ing. Jarmila Loskotová | Praha | Rated | 1.15 | 44% | 2334d | N/A |
| 34 | Dipl.-Ing. Ing. Jaroslav Novotný | Praha | Rated | 1.352941 | 56% | 1806d | N/A |
| 35 | Doc. Ing. Jindřich Špaček, CSc. | Brno | Rated | 0.9 | 76% | 2061d | N/A |
| 36 | Ing. Mgr. Hana Holasová | Brno | Rated | 1.190476 | 41% | 1784d | N/A |
| 37 | JUDr. Michal Havlík | Praha | Rated | 0.631579 | 80% | 1611d | N/A |
| 38 | Originvent | Praha 2 | Rated | 2.2 | 100% | 601d | N/A |
| 39 | RNDr. Zdeňka Halaxová | Prague | Rated | 1.111111 | 33% | 1469d | N/A |
| 40 | Mgr. Karel Bauer | Praha 4 | Rated | 4.2 | 58% | 1692d | N/A |
| 41 | Ing. Vladimír Belfín | Hostivice | Rated | 1 | 25% | 1632d | N/A |
| 42 | Nezlobin, Nikolai | Praha 2 - Vinohrady | Rated | 2.3 | 50% | 1245d | N/A |
| 43 | Ing. Fischer, Michael | Praha 2 | Rated | 0.904762 | 71% | 1429d | N/A |
| 44 | Ing. Petr Řezáč, CSc. | Prague | Rated | 1.1 | 64% | 1476d | N/A |
| 45 | Giuliano, Natalia | Prague | Rated | 3.333333 | 100% | 997d | N/A |
| 46 | PATENTSERVIS PRAHA | Prague | Rated | 0.95 | 65% | 2361d | N/A |
| 47 | Ing. Vítězslav Žák | Troubsko | Rated | 1.222222 | 36% | 2192d | N/A |
| 48 | Ing Jana Vandělíková | Praha | Rated | 1.375 | 50% | 1880d | N/A |
| 49 | Krmencik, Vaclav | Praha 4 | Rated | 1.083333 | 54% | 1606d | N/A |
| 50 | JUDr. Petra Sauvage de Brantes | Praha | Rated | 0.611111 | 90% | 1519d | N/A |
Explore the interactive Czech Republic rankings (sortable, with designs, patents and emerging-window views), the methodology, or the FAQ.